Therefore, departments and institutions often use the software tools at a lower cost than individual researchers do. However, all three packages offer discounts for multiple usages. Dedoose is the only software package that does not charge an extra cost for upgrades.
HyperRESEARCH also has the same pricing model and costs up to $2,300 yearly (IST, 2014). Comparatively, NVivo adopts an annual pricing plan of $2,345 per year (IST, 2014). IST (2014) clarifies that the base price for using the software package is $12.95. Dedoose has the most flexible pricing plan, which depends on monthly payments. Indeed, all the software tools have a “paid” business model.
Cost is another important issue that distinguishes the three software tools highlighted in this paper. Lastly, Dedoose has a poor documentation quality (Lewins & Silver, 2007). The NVivo software tool is also superior to the other two tools because it has a high documentation quality, while HyperRESEARCH has a “fair” documentation quality (IST, 2014). However, this similarity does not stretch to customer support availability because NVivo and HyperRESEARCH have an efficient customer support system, while Dedoose has “medium” customer support efficacy. All the software packages have the same business model – paid business model (IST, 2014). While NVivo is a desktop future web tool, HyperRESEARCH is a desktop tool and Dedoose is a web tool (IST, 2014). NVivo, HyperRESEARCH, and Dedoose have different types of software locations. Comparison of NVivo, HyperRESEARCH, and Dedoose Launched in 2010, the software tool also gave researchers the option of using it on their “iPads” (Scientific Software Development, 2014). Nonetheless, Dedoose changed the dynamics of qualitative research by providing qualitative researchers with the option of using whichever operating system they wanted.
YOUTUBE HYPERRESEARCH MAC
However, this process defeated the purpose of having a Mac operating system in the first place. ti or NVivo by using hard drive partitions to conduct Mac-based research (Scientific Software Development, 2014). Often, researchers had to depend on Atlas. However, before the introduction of Dedoose, researchers had few options to choose from, if they wanted to conduct Mac-based research studies (Hahn, 2008). NVivo and Atlas are good software tools because they are applicable in computers that have a Mac operating system. Although it has a relatively steep learning curve, compared to HyperRESEARCH, researchers have often used it for analyzing unstructured qualitative data (Silvana & Judith, 2009). NVivo is an internationally recognized software tool for qualitative research that traces its roots to Australian institutions of higher learning (Scientific Software Development, 2014). This advantage is essential for studies that use different researchers because it allows them to use the software with different computers. Most researchers like to use the HyperRESEARCH technique because it accommodates different operating systems (including Microsoft and Mac) (Scientific Software Development, 2014). It is different from the NVivo technique because it allows a researcher to conduct his study in his way (Researchware, Inc., 2014).
HyperRESEARCH is a common software tool for analyzing qualitative data.
0 kommentar(er)
